MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4404788110 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347597

Nucleus of M31: Upper limits to the molecular and ionised gas content

2024· article· en· W4404788110 on OpenAlexfundno aff
A. L. Melchior, F. Combes

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institutes of Natural SciencesNational Astronomical Observatory of JapanCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueAlberta Livestock and Meat AgencyObservatoire de Paris, Université de Recherche Paris Sciences et LettresMax-Planck-GesellschaftNational Science FoundationKorea Astronomy and Space Science InstituteNational Radio Astronomy Observatory
KeywordsPhysicsNucleusAstrophysicsContent (measure theory)AstronomyNeuroscienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report observations performed with the NOrthern Extended Millimeter Array (NOEMA) and Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) of the nucleus of Andromeda (M31) that place strong constraints on the presence of gas in the cold or warm phase. M31 hosts the largest supermassive black hole (SMBH) closer than 1 Mpc to us. Its nucleus is silent, with some murmurs at the level of 4 × 10−9LEdd, and it is surrounded by a disc of old stars with a radius of 5 pc. The mass loss from these stars is expected to fill a molecular gas disc within the tidal truncation of 1 pc ( = 0.26 arcsec) of 104 M⊙, corresponding to a CO(1–0) signal of 2 mJy with a line width of 1000 km/s. We observed the nucleus with NOEMA in CO(2–1) and with ALMA in CO(3–2) with angular resolutions of 0.5″(1.9 pc) and 0.12″(0.46 pc), respectively. We exclude the presence of molecular gas with an upper limit of 3σ on the H2 mass of 195 M⊙ based on CO(3–2) ALMA observations. The CO(3–2) upper limit also constrains warm gas, which escapes detection in CO(1–0). The scenario of cold gas accumulation next to the nucleus of M31 that originates from mass loss of the old stellar population is not verified and excluded at a level of 150σ. The hot gas expelled by the stellar winds might instead never cool or fall onto the disc. Alternatively, the mass-loss rate of the stellar wind may have been overestimated by a factor 50, and/or the ionised gas has escaped from the nucleus. The SMBH in M31 clearly is in a low activity state, similar to what is observed for Sgr A* in the Milky Way (MW). Recently, a cool (104 K) ionised accretion disc has been detected around Sgr A* in the H30α recombination line with ALMA. If the sizes, masses, and fluxes were rescaled according to the mass of the black hole of M31 (35 times higher than in the MW) and its distance (97 times further away than in the MW), a similar disc might easily be detectable around the nucleus of M31. The expected signal would be eight times weaker that the signal detected in SgrA*. We searched for an ionised gas disc around the nucleus of M31 with NOEMA, and we place a 3σ upper limit on the H30α recombination line at a level twice lower than expected with a simple scaling of the SgrA*.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→