MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404788240 · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3507695

A Continuous Authentication Approach for Mobile Crowdsourcing Based on Federated Learning

2024· article· en· W4404788240 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamad Wazzeh, Hakima Ould‐Slimane, Chamseddine Talhi, Azzam Mourad, Mohsen Guizani

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrowdsourcingComputer scienceAuthentication (law)World Wide WebComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the widespread use of smartphones and wearable devices, Mobile Crowdsourcing (MCS) has become a powerful method for gathering and processing data from various users. MCS offers several advantages, including improved mobility, scalability, cost-effectiveness, and the utilization of collective human intelligence. However, ensuring the authenticity of users throughout the data collection process remains a challenge. Current authentication methods, such as traditional PIN codes, two-factor authentication, and biometric authentication, often struggle to provide continuous verification while adequately protecting user privacy. This paper addresses this issue by proposing a new continuous authentication approach based on Federated Learning. This approach combines continuous identity verification with privacy preservation benefits, allowing for the ongoing validation of user authenticity during data collection while improving authentication accuracy. We also discuss the non-Independently and Identically Distributed issue in Federated Learning and employ transfer learning techniques based on feature extraction to enhance the performance of the authentication models. We conducted extensive experiments using various datasets to evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed method. The results of this study demonstrate its potential to enhance the security and privacy of MCS systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicMobile Crowdsensing and CrowdsourcingFrench-language works237,207