Case Study of Long-Term Bearing and Expansion Joint Movement on a Prestressed Concrete Bridge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bearings and expansion joints are critical elements of many bridges that permit deformations of the superstructure due to creep, shrinkage, and changes in temperature to occur without the development of longitudinal stresses. Despite their importance in ensuring the functionality and longevity of bridge structures, there is a lack of data in the literature on the long-term performance of bridge bearings and expansion joints, especially under harsh environmental conditions. This paper presents the results of a long-term monitoring campaign on the bearing and expansion joint movement on the Waaban Crossing bridge in Kingston, Ontario, Canada. The bridge movement was measured using a low-cost microelectromechanical system and Internet of things-based monitoring system. The study results revealed that the monitored bridge structure was behaving as expected and that the observed long-term trends in the movement of the bearings and expansion joints were in agreement with the assumptions made in the design of the bridge. The paper also discusses the challenges surrounding the creation of a robust and reliable monitoring system in harsh climatic conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".