MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4404807343 · doi:10.1370/afm.22.s1.7069

Co-occurring Issues Facing Patients Who Use Unregulated Drugs: Insights From a Survey in Edmonton, Canada

2024· article· en· W4404807343 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Connolly, Heather Morris, Okan Bulut, Campion Cottrell-McDermott, Elaine Hyshka, Tariq Z. Issa, Bethany Piggott, Marliss Taylor, Ginetta Salvalaggio

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context The COVID-19 pandemic and ongoing unregulated drug poisoning emergency have dramatically increased morbidity and mortality in major urban centres across the US and Canada. Objective The objective of this study was to characterize the substance use patterns of people who use drugs (PWUD), assess the rates of co-occurring conditions and examine the health service needs of this population. Study Design Cross-sectional study using a community-based survey. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Setting or Dataset Participants were recruited from community organizations in central Edmonton, Canada to participate in interviewer-administered surveys from April to September 2023. Population Studied 499 structurally vulnerable PWUD, defined as engaging in regular use of currently illegal drugs at least once a month and spending time in Edmonton9s inner city. Intervention/Instrument Survey questions focused on socio-demographic information, substance use patterns, health status, use of treatment and harm reduction services, and acceptability of emerging services. Participants received a CA$30 cash honorarium for their time. Outcome Measures N/A Results 65% (324/499) of participants identified as men, and the average age was 44. 69% (343/499) of participants identified as Indigenous, and a majority of participants (80%, 401/499) did not currently have housing. 88% (440/499) reported having witnessed a drug poisoning/overdose in the previous 6 months, and 75% (376/499) reported having lost someone they cared about to a drug poisoning. Of those who reported losing someone they cared about, 81% (304/376) said they have lost more people due to poisonings since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. 76% (379/499) of participants expressed having a diagnosed or undiagnosed serious mental health problem, such as depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia. 40% (201/499) of participants were reluctant to seek medical care because they use drugs. Conclusions There is a substantial rate of co-occurring houselessness and mental illness among PWUD in central Edmonton. This is compounded by both widespread grief from the loss of loved ones to a highly potent and often contaminated drug supply, and reluctance to seek out medical care. These results point to the importance of using a trauma-informed lens to address co-occurring mental health conditions and structural vulnerability among patients who use drugs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.276

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes→French-language works237,207→