MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404808405 · doi:10.1370/afm.22.s1.6576

Pregnant women's intention to use a mobile application-based decision aid for prenatal screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13

2024· article· en· W4404808405 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
France Légaré, Alexandre Bureau, Souleymane Gadio, Sabrina Guay-Bélanger, Odilon Quentin Assan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Annals of Family Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObstetricsPrenatal screeningMedicinePrenatal diagnosisComputer sciencePregnancyPsychologyGynecologyFetusBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context: Decision-making regarding prenatal screening is complex that can be supported by from decision aids. Mobile health technologies have led to apps that assist pregnant women in making informed health decisions. Objective: assess pregnant women9s intention to use a mobile application to make decisions about prenatal screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13. Study Design and Analysis: Mixed-methods cross-sectional study complying with STROBE and COREQ guidelines, including descriptive, bivariate and multivariate analyses of quantitative data and thematic analysis of qualitative data. Setting: Study conducted in Quebec City and Montreal, among women at least 16 weeks pregnant or who had given birth in the previous year, and who had no high-risk pregnancies. Population Studied: Participants included 67 eligible pregnant women, mostly Canadian, French-speaking, aged 25 to 34 and highly educated. Instrument: For the quantitative phase, participants used a paper-based decision aid about prenatal screening and completed a questionnaire, the CDP-Reaction, to assess their intention as well as psychosocial determinants related to the intention to use a mobile app with similar content. For the qualitative phase, participants viewed a video on shared decision-making using the paper-based medium described above and discussed their use of smartphones as well as mobile health apps. Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measured was pregnant women9s intention to use the mobile application, quantified on a scale of 1 to 7, and then the identification of these potential predictors. Results: The mean intention score was 4.92 out of 7, indicating a strong intention to use the mobile app. The significant factors positively associated with this intention were beliefs in consequences (β: 1.21; 5% CI: 1.02 – 1.39; p <0.0001) and social influence (β: 0.17; 5% CI: 0.01-0.32 ; p=0.03). Most of the women who had already used pregnancy apps rated the mobile app positively, but also many were open to adopting other formats of such a decision aid (web version, paper etc.). Conclusions: The results suggest a strong intention among pregnant women to use the mobile app to make the decision in relation to screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13, influenced by perceived advantages and disadvantages of its use and peer opinion. Interventions to promote informed choice in prenatal screening should target these influencing factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.176
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Annals of Family MedicineSame topicPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207