MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact of “Immediate Kangaroo Mother Care” on Survival of Low Birth Weight Neonates in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Prospective Cohort Study

2024· article· en· W4404814644 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mallikarjun Talikoti, Deepa Kundargi, Siddu Charki, Chinmaya Rodgi, Mallanagouda M Patil

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Child Health and Nutrition · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfant Development and Preterm Care
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTertiary careProspective cohort studyCohort studyLow birth weightCohortPediatricsDemographyFamily medicinePregnancyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: “Kangaroo mother care,” a type of newborn care involving skin-to-skin contact with the mother or other caregiver (grandmother), reduces mortality in neonates with low birth weight (< 2 kg) when initiated after stabilization, but the majority of deaths occur before stabilization. The safety and efficacy of kangaroo mother care initiated soon after birth among neonates with low birth weight iKMC is uncertain. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study involving neonates with a birth weight < 1.8 kg who were assigned to receive immediate kangaroo mother care (intervention) or conventional care in a radiant warmer until their condition stabilized and kangaroo mother care after that (control). The primary outcomes were death in the neonatal period (the first 28 days of life) and the first 72 hours of life. Results: Two hundred eleven neonates and their mothers were assigned to the intervention group (106 neonates with their mothers) or the control group (105 neonates with their mothers). The median daily duration of skin-to-skin contact in the neonatal intensive care unit was 9.9 hours (interquartile range, 6.0 to 15.7) in the intervention group and 3.5 hours (interquartile range, 1.3 to 6.3) in the control group. Neonatal death occurred in the first 28 days in 12% neonates in the intervention group and 15.7% neonates in the control group (relative risk of death, 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 0.89; P=0.001); neonatal death in the first 72 hours of life occurred in 4.6% neonates in the intervention group and 5.8% neonates in the control group (Relative risk of death, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.58to 1.04; P = 0.09). Conclusions: Among neonates with a birth weight < 1.8 kg, those who received immediate kangaroo mother care had lower mortality at 28 days than those who received conventional care with kangaroo mother care initiated after stabilization; the between-group difference favoring immediate kangaroo mother care at 72 hours was not significant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Child Health and NutritionSame topicInfant Development and Preterm CareFrench-language works237,207