MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404836171 · doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2024.11.008

Efficacy and safety of AZR-MD-001 selenium sulfide ophthalmic ointment in adults with meibomian gland dysfunction over six months of treatment: A Phase 2, vehicle-controlled, randomized extension trial

2024· article· en· W4404836171 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Ocular Surface · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Surface and Contact Lens
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeibomian glandRandomized controlled trialMedicineSeleniumDermatologySurgeryChemistryEyelid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of AZR-MD-001 (0.5 % and 1.0 %) ophthalmic ointment, relative to vehicle, over 3-6 months of treatment, in participants with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). METHODS: This was a Phase 2, randomized, vehicle-controlled, multicenter extension clinical trial. Eligible participants were adults with MGD (meibomian gland secretion score (MGS) ≤12 out of 15 glands) who discontinued all other dry eye or MGD treatments. Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to apply AZR-MD-001 1.0 %, 0.5 %, or vehicle to the lower eyelids, twice weekly. Key exploratory endpoints included the least-squared mean difference between groups in the change from baseline in clinical signs (meibomian gland yielding score; MGYLS) and symptoms (Ocular Surface Disease Index; OSDI), at clinic visits at Month 4.5 and 6, and safety measures from 36 months. RESULTS: Participants (66.5 % female) were randomized, at baseline, to AZR-MD-001 0.5 % (n = 82), 1.0 % (n = 83), or vehicle (n = 80). Statistically significant improvements, compared to vehicle, were observed at Month 6 in MGYLS for both AZR-MD-001 groups (0.5 % group: 1.9, 95 % CI 0.9 to 2.8, P = 0.002; 1.0 % group: 1.1, 95 % CI 0.2 to 2.1, P = 0.026), and in OSDI score for the 0.5 % group (-4.5, 95 % CI -8.0 to -0.9, P = 0.0135). The most common adverse events for AZR-MD-001 were application site pain, superficial punctate keratitis and eye pain; most were mild to moderate in severity, and decreased in incidence over time. CONCLUSIONS: AZR-MD-001 (0.5 %) was efficacious in treating signs and symptoms of MGD over six months, with a lower observed incidence of new adverse events over time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.765

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it