MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404838064 · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2024.09.590

A Survey for Educational Metaverse: Advances and Beyond

2024· article· en· W4404838064 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Computer Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducation and Learning Interventions
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersEast China Normal UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceMetaverseData scienceHuman–computer interactionVirtual reality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Metaverse, a convergence of cutting-edge technologies such as Virtual Reality (VR), Augmented Reality (AR), Artificial Intelligence (AI), and blockchain, represents the next frontier in digital society’s evolution. Meanwhile, as societal emphasis on education intensifies, a multitude of novel technologies are being integrated into the educational landscape with the aim of improving overall educational outcomes. This trend has resulted in the conceptualization of the Educational Metaverse as an extension of Metaverse applications in this domain. Notwithstanding its advent, there exists a notable dearth of scholarly efforts dedicated to meticulously summarizing and analyzing the most up-to-date research findings on the Educational Metaverse. Thus, this study systematically reviews recent literature to examine the Metaverse’s role in education, a field that stands to benefit significantly from the integration of these technologies. From an interdisciplinary perspective, guided by the insights derived from clustering algorithms, approximately 90 recent publications were meticulously analysed to explore and synthesise various aspects pertaining to the Educational Metaverse. This comprehensive review meticulously explores its primary characteristics, progression of foundatonal technologies, and multiplicity of practical implementations, thereby unravelling the transformative potential it holds for revolutionising pedagogical practices. The findings underscore the Educational Metaverse’s capacity to enhance learner engagement and motivation through immersive experiences, while also addressing the educational needs of individuals with special requirements. The study highlights the importance of optimizing the Educational Metaverse’s technical architecture and developing pedagogical strategies that are inclusive and effective. Furthermore, it emphasizes the need to ensure educational equity and accessibility, allowing all learners to harness the benefits of this technological innovation. As the Metaverse emerges as a pivotal force in educational modernization, it is anticipated that its applications will continue to proliferate. The research further indicates that the future trajectory of the Educational Metaverse is poised towards comprehensiveness and integration, with technology advancements emphasizing real-time capabilities and security enhancements. It is anticipated to extend its reach into a broader array of scenarios, thereby enabling a wider cross-section of disciplines and populations to reap the benefits it affords.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score0.867

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it