MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404839121 · doi:10.1364/oe.536543

Linear field-resolved spectroscopy approaching ultimate detection sensitivity

2024· article· en· W4404839121 on OpenAlexaff
Christina Höfer, Daniel G. Bausch, Lukas Fürst, Zheng Wei, Maximilian Högner, T. Butler, Martin Gebhardt, Tobias Heuermann, Christian Gaida, Kiran Sankar Maiti, Marinus Huber, Ernst E. Fill, Jens Limpert, Ferenc Krausz, Nicholas Karpowicz, Ioachim Pupeza

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Express · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersEuropean Research CouncilMax Planck School of PhotonicsBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungChina Scholarship CouncilDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsOpticsSpectroscopySensitivity (control systems)Materials scienceField (mathematics)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electric-field oscillations are now experimentally accessible in the THz-to-PHz frequency range. Their measurement delivers the most comprehensive information content attainable by optical spectroscopy – if performed with high sensitivity. Yet, the trade-off between bandwidth and efficiency associated with the nonlinear mixing necessary for field sampling has so far strongly restricted sensitivity in applications such as field-resolved spectroscopy of molecular vibrations. Here, we demonstrate electric-field sampling of octave-spanning mid-infrared waves in the 18-to-39 THz (600-to-1300 cm -1 ) spectral region, with amplitudes ranging from the MV/cm level down to a few mV/cm. We show that employing powerful 2-µm gate pulses is key to approaching the ultimate detection limit of capturing all photons in the temporal gate, as well as providing high linearity with respect to the detected mid-infrared field. This combination of detection sensitivity, dynamic range, and linearity enables the exploitation of the full potential of emerging high-power waveform-controlled infrared sources for (non-)linear spectroscopy of solids, liquids, and gases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics ExpressSame topicSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical ResearchFrench-language works237,207