MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404854495 · doi:10.7759/cureus.74744

A Unique Case of Internuclear Ophthalmoplegia and Artery of Percheron Infarct

2024· article· en· W4404854495 on OpenAlexaff
Liam D Redden, Gordon J Gubitz

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Eye Disorders
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnisocoriaEmergency departmentRadiologyStroke (engine)Differential diagnosisAngiographyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This case report discusses a unique presentation of an artery of Percheron (AOP) infarct resulting in rapidly resolving internuclear ophthalmoplegia (INO) without classical signs. This is the case of a 70-year-old male patient who presented to a community Emergency Department following acute code stroke activation. Physical exam and imaging studies including non-contrast CT, CT angiography, CT perfusion, and MRI were performed. A review of the literature was also conducted. MRI confirmed acute bilateral thalamic ischemic changes consistent with AOP infarcts. Symptoms of acute blurred vision, slurred speech, right hemi-face and tongue numbness, and signs of anisocoria, left INO, mild left skew deviation, and impaired convergence on the left resolved within 48 hours without intervention. The patient was discharged as neurologically normal and follow-up investigations did not identify a cause for the stroke. The literature suggests varying presentations of AOP infarcts, with INO being rare. This case deviates from classical AOP presentations, emphasizing the importance of considering AOP infarcts early in differential diagnoses, particularly with unusual neuro-ophthalmological findings. Imaging modalities such as MRI with DWI prove crucial for early diagnosis, although AOP occlusions remain challenging to detect due to the small vessel size. Our case contributes to expanding knowledge of AOP infarct presentations and underscores the need for vigilance in recognizing atypical manifestations for timely diagnosis/management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.453
Threshold uncertainty score0.413

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicOphthalmology and Eye DisordersFrench-language works237,207