MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404857244 · doi:10.54066/jpsi.v2i4.2454

Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Pegawai Non-PNS Terbaik di Dinas Pengendalian Penduduk Dan Keluarga Berencana Kota Binjai Menggunakan Metode Moosra Dan Roc

2024· article· en· W4404857244 on OpenAlexaff
Rianty Zabitha Siregar, Relita Buaton, Rusmin Saragih

Bibliographic record

VenueJURNAL PENELITIAN SISTEM INFORMASI (JPSI) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Studies and Policies
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesMathematicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Employee evaluations within an organization are efforts to measure and motivate employees to enhance their skills and abilities. These evaluations are expected to help the organization assess and identify improvements or developments in employee capabilities to support the organization in achieving its goals. The evaluations are anticipated to produce fair and transparent results that are acceptable to all parties involved. The rapid advancement of information technology has brought changes to the employee evaluation process. Specifically, the Population Control and Family Planning Office of Binjai City requires a system that can assist in evaluating the performance of its non-permanent employees. There are various methods that can be used in designing a system to produce the best decisions. Among them is the MOOSRA (Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Simple Ratio Analysis) method, which is one of the multi-objective optimization techniques used in decision support systems. The MOOSRA method is similar to the MOORA method but differs in performance score determination: MOORA uses a reduction operator, while MOOSRA relies on calculations based on criteria and alternative division operators. MOOSRA performs calculations based on the provided criteria and alternatives. To determine the weight of each criterion, the ROC (Rank Order Centroid) method is employed, which assigns weights to each criterion based on their ranking and priority levels. This ensures that the evaluation of non-permanent employees at the Population Control and Family Planning Office of Binjai City produces the best results. The MOOSRA and ROC methods can be used to build a decision support system that delivers optimal evaluations of non-permanent employees. Awarding the title of "best employee" can enhance morale and motivation among employees in achieving the organization's previously established goals. The selection of the best non-permanent employee must be conducted fairly and transparently so that the results are accepted by all non-permanent employees of the Population Control and Family Planning Office of Binjai City. A decision support system performs calculations based on established criteria for each alternative and provides recommendations that can help leadership make the best decisions. The MOOSRA method is a decision support system technique that uses multi-criteria analysis in its calculations, while the ROC method aids in determining the weight of criteria based on their priority.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJURNAL PENELITIAN SISTEM INFORMASI (JPSI)Same topicLegal Studies and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207