Intrinsic Room‐Temperature Phosphorescent Hydrogel Driven by Phase Separation and Glass Transition
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Designing room‐temperature phosphorescent (RTP) hydrogels presents a unique challenge in comparison to RTP polymeric films and powders, due to the quenching of phosphorescence by water molecules within the hydrogel and their inherent softness. This study presents the first example of intrinsic RTP hydrogels without doping by luminophores or stiffening agents. The hydrogel is synthesized by copolymerizing acrylamide (Am) with N ‐acryloyl‐aminoundecanoic acid (NAUA). The hydrophobic NAUA induces phase separation in the hydrogel network and the glass transition of the hydrophobic phase can stiffen the structure and constrain the mobility of water molecules and chain segments. Under such condition, the clustering of amide and carboxylic acid groups triggers the emission of RTP with a persistent afterglow exceeding 1.5 s, which is as good as the reported RTP hydrogels with dopants. When the hydrogel is heated above its glass transition temperature, its modulus drops quickly from 20.0 to 0.026 MPa within 2 s and RTP also diminishes. Taking advantage of the temperature‐switchable rigidity and RTP behavior, the hydrogels are endowed with functions such as shape memory, temperature‐sensing, and information concealment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it