Analyzing Decision-Making in Cognitive Agent Simulations Using Generalized Linear Mixed-Effects Models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Enhancing model interpretability remains an ongoing challenge in predictive modelling, especially when applied to simulation data from complex systems. Investigating the influence and effects of design factors within computer simulations of complex systems requires assessing variable importance through statistical models. These models are crucial for capturing the relationships between factors and response variables. This study focuses on understanding functional patterns and their magnitudes of influence regarding designed factors affecting cognitive agent decision-making in a cellular automaton-based highway crossing simulation. We aim to identify the most influential design factors in the complex system simulation model to better understand the relationship between the decision outcomes and the designed factors. We apply Generalized Linear Mixed-Effects Models to explain the significant functional connections between designed factors and response variables, specifically quantifying variable importance. Our analysis demonstrates the practicality and effectiveness of the proposed models and methodologies for analyzing data from complex systems. The findings offer a deeper understanding of the connections between design factors and their resulting responses, facilitating a greater understanding of the underlying dynamics and contributing to the fields of applied mathematics, simulation modelling, and computation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".