Experimental Investigation on the Effectiveness of EB-CFRP Confinement of Elliptical Concrete Columns
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the results of an experimental study involving 20 tests performed on elliptical concrete columns confined with externally bonded carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (EB-CFRP) laminates. The study aimed to evaluate the effects of elliptical aspect ratio (A/B) as well as confinement rigidity (number of EB-FRP layers) on confinement effectiveness. The experimental program consisted of one series of control concrete columns (unstrengthened) and three additional series, each one strengthened with one, two and three layers of EB-CFRP sheets, respectively. Furthermore, each series considered five elliptical aspect ratios (A/B) ranging from 1.0 to 1.6. Following compressive concentric tests until failure, the results were analyzed to characterize the confinement level with an increasing number of EB-CFRP layers as a function of the elliptical aspect ratio. The results show considerable enhancements in compressive strength and in the ductility of the confined columns. Furthermore, this improvement is amplified as the number of EB-CFRP layers increases, indicating a proportional relationship between the compressive strength and the number of CFRP layers. It is found that the ultimate strength of EB-CFRP-confined columns with three layers reached up to 130% compared to the control specimens. However, increasing the elliptical aspect ratio reduced the compressive strength and ductility of confined columns. This study investigated the relation between the CFRP hoop and axial strains and the elliptical aspect ratios. Moreover, through comparison, the results reveal that the prediction models proposed by the Canadian standards S806-12 and S6-19 do not capture the negative effect of the elliptical aspect ratio in confined concrete columns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".