Économie psychique et écoanxiété. Ce que la théorie freudienne apporte à l’écologie politique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La métapsychologie exposée par Sigmund Freud dans sa première topique de 1915, ainsi que l’étude des phénomènes d’angoisse sur lesquelles la seconde topique de l’auteur insiste à partir de 1923, offrent à l’écologie politique des éléments conceptuels pour analyser des phénomènes tels que l’écoanxiété. L’objectif de ce texte est de montrer comment se constitue l’objet psychique dans la théorie psychanalytique d’origine et comment cette approche permet de mesure l’ampleur de la crise que représente ce qu’on appelle en écologie politique l’écoanxiété, mais qui s’apparente le plus souvent à une écoangoisse. Cette démarche conceptuelle procède par analyse textuelle et intègre le discours psychanalytique aux démarches philosophique, comme cela a été fait en France couramment durant le dernier tiers du XX e siècle. Cela donne lieu à une appréciation de la construction d’objets substitutifs que tendent à se donner les sujet de l’Époque dans laquelle nous plonge la crise écologique, par incapacité de se donner des objets conformes à la portée inouïe des problèmes actuels. The metapsychology expounded by Sigmund Freud in his First Topic of 1915, and the study of anxiety phenomena emphasized in the author's Second Topic from 1923 onwards, provide political ecology with conceptual elements for analyzing phenomena such as ecoanxiety. The aim of this text is to show how the psychic object is constituted in the original psychoanalytic theory, and how this approach enables us to measure the scale of the crisis represented by what is known in political ecology as ecoanxiety, but which is more often than not akin to ecoanguish. This conceptual approach proceeds by textual analysis, integrating psychoanalytical discourse with philosophical approaches, as was common practice in France during the last third of the 20th century. The result is an appraisal of the construction of substitute objects that the subjects of the epoch into which the ecological crisis plunges us tend to give themselves, out of an inability to give themselves objects in keeping with the unprecedented scope of today's problems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".