MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404870184 · doi:10.1016/j.jid.2024.10.613

Identification of miR-141 as a Regulator of Epidermal Homeostasis

2024· article· en· W4404870184 on OpenAlexafffund
Diane‐Lore Vieu, Christelle Golebiewski, Cécile Gastaldi, Aude Foucher, Bernard Mari, Roger Rezzonico, Arnaud Droit, Martine Dumont, Philippe Bastien, Françoise Bernerd, Claire Marionnet

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Investigative Dermatology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersAgence Nationale de la RechercheUniversité Côte d’AzurUniversité Laval
KeywordsRegulatorIdentification (biology)HomeostasisMaster regulatorBiologyComputational biologyCell biologyGeneticsTranscription factorGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MicroRNAs, small endogenous noncoding RNAs, are involved in the regulation of epidermal homeostasis. Among them, miR-203 was the most described and expressed in human epidermis, promoting keratinocyte (KC) differentiation by repressing genes involved in proliferation. To identify other microRNAs involved in this process, the miRNomes of normal human KCs cultured in monolayer (2-dimensional) or in 3-dimensional reconstructed skin were compared. Besides miR-203, miR-141 was one of the most expressed microRNAs in 3-dimensional culture and was overexpressed in 3-dimensional versus 2-dimensional condition, that is, during KC differentiation. Functional experiments revealed that, mostly expressed in the basal layer, miR-141 decreased KC proliferation and clonogenicity while promoting differentiation. Target prediction algorithm coupled with transcriptomic data of KCs overexpressing miR-141 as well as 3' untranslated region luciferase assays highlighted CCND2 mRNA as a direct target of miR-141, leading to its downregulation by miR-141 overexpression. Finally, CCND2 silencing decreased KC proliferation and induced differentiation, revealing that miR-141 action was mediated by CCND2. MiR-141 features were also compared with those of miR-203 in parallel experiments. Although miR-141 displayed functions similar to those of miR-203, it exhibited different localization and targets, suggesting a joint participation of miR-141 and miR-203 in engaging and maintaining KC toward differentiation, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Investigative DermatologySame topicMicroRNA in disease regulationFrench-language works237,207