Adjoint-based goal-oriented implicit shock tracking using full space mesh optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Solutions to the governing partial differential equations obtained from a discrete numerical scheme can have significant errors, especially near shocks where the discrete representation of the solution cannot fully capture the discontinuity in the solution. Recent approaches of shock tracking [1] , [2] implicitly align the faces of mesh elements with the shock, yielding accurate solutions on coarse meshes. In engineering applications, the solution field is often used to evaluate a scalar functional of interest, such as lift or drag over an airfoil. While functionals are sensitive to errors in the flow solution, certain regions in the domain are more important for accurate evaluation of the functional than the rest. Using this fact, we formulate a goal-oriented implicit shock tracking approach that captures a segment of the discontinuity that is important for evaluating the functional. Shock tracking is achieved using the Lagrange-Newton-Krylov-Schur (LNKS) full space optimizer to minimize the adjoint-weighted residual error indicator. We also present a method to evaluate the sensitivity and the Hessian of the functional error. Using available block preconditioners for LNKS [3] , [4] makes the full space approach scalable. The method is applied to test cases of two-dimensional advection and inviscid compressible flows to demonstrate functional-dependent shock tracking. Tracking the entire shock without using artificial dissipation results in the error converging at the orders of O ( h p + 1 ) . • Objective function based on the adjoint-weighted residual for functional-dependent shock tracking. • Derivation of second-order derivatives of the adjoint-weighted residual to enhance convergence. • Full space optimization using Lagrange-Newton-Krylov-Schur (LNKS) framework.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".