The effect of proton irradiation on dealloying of Alloy 800 in an aqueous environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• Alloy 800 is susceptible to dissolution of Fe and Cr in boiling caustic solution. • Selective dissolution results in a Ni-rich porous layer on Alloy 800. • Proton irradiation forms dislocation loops and elemental segregation in Alloy 800. • Proton irradiation defect production and segregation accelerate dealloying of Alloy 800. • The morphology and chemistry of the dealloyed layer formed is altered due to irradiation. The effect of prior proton irradiation on the subsequent corrosion and dealloying of Alloy 800 was investigated in a 50 wt. % NaOH caustic solution at 140 °C. Dealloying of irradiated (1 dpa) and non-irradiated Alloy 800 was characterized at the nanoscale to provide mechanistic insight. A porous surface film enriched in Ni was formed on both irradiated and non-irradiated materials due to selective dissolution of Fe and Cr. However, the microstructure and chemistry in the dealloyed layer was altered by irradiation, including deeper dealloyed layer penetration, finer porosity, and changes in the classical core-shell ligament structure in the irradiated material.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".