Fast-charging all-solid-state battery cathodes with long cycle life
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many battery applications target fast charging to achieve an 80 % rise in state of charge (SOC) in < 15 min. However, in the case of all-solid-state batteries (SSBs), they typically take several hours to reach 80 % SOC while retaining a high specific energy of 400 W h k g cell − 1 . We specify design strategies for fast-charging SSB cathodes with long cycle life and investigate the fast-charging capability of a sulfide-based single crystal Li-Ni-Mn-Co oxide composite cathode. At 30 °C and charging at 15 mA cm − 2 , a specific capacity of 150 mA h g − 1 was achieved in ∼ 8 min, with 81 % capacity retention after 3000 cycles. Critically, a 3-electrode arrangement was used to avoid the common problem of overcharging at high current densities. By following the design strategy and optimized manufacturing, a 210 µm thick cathode was able to be charged at an extraordinary current density of 50 mA cm − 2 to reach an areal capacity of 8 mA h cm − 2 in only 10 min, suggesting practical cathodes for SSBs with 400 W h k g cell − 1 may be within reach. • Fast charging at 15 mA cm −2 and room temperature demonstrated in composite cathodes. • 80 % increase in state of charge in < 10 min revealed by a 3-electrode arrangement. • 81 % capacity retention after 3000 fast-charge cycles. • Design guidelines for fast-charging all-solid-state battery cathodes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".