MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404894797 · doi:10.1186/s44167-024-00068-2

Effects of flexible learning spaces, active breaks, and active lessons on sedentary behaviors, physical activity, learning, and musculoskeletal health in school-aged children: a scoping review

2024· review· en· W4404894797 on OpenAlexaff
David Larose, Alix St-Aubin, Valérie Boulay-Pelletier, Marie Denise Lavoie, Jennifer Yessis, Angelo Tremblay, Vicky Drapeau

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Activity Sedentary and Sleep Behaviors · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooCentre Intégré de Santé et Services Sociaux de Chaudière-AppalacheUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysical activitySedentary behaviorPsychologyPhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Children aged 6 to 17 spend long periods of sitting at school. Reducing these behaviors and increasing physical activity has been linked to improvements in cognitive functions and decreased musculoskeletal issues. The purpose of this scoping review was to describe interventions implementing flexible learning spaces, active breaks, and active lessons and their effects on sedentary behaviors as well as on physical activity, learning, and musculoskeletal health. METHODS: A search on databases (EDUCATION SOURCE, ERIC, SPORTDISCUS, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and WEB OF SCIENCE) was carried out in April 2021 and updated in June 2022 according to the guidelines of the "PRISMA-ScR". Studies on flexible learning spaces and physical activity in elementary and secondary school classes were retained. These also had to measure the effects of the interventions on sedentary behaviors, physical activity, learning (e.g., academic achievement), and musculoskeletal health outcomes. RESULTS: Ninety-two articles were identified; twenty-four from the initial screening, thirty-two from the update, and thirty-six were manually included. Among these 92 articles, twenty-one studies used only flexible learning spaces, twenty-three used only active breaks, thirty-six used only active lessons, four used both flexible learning spaces and active breaks separately in different classes, five combined active breaks and active lessons, and three combined flexible learning spaces and active breaks. Analyses show positive changes in sedentary behaviors (32 articles/40) and physical activity (52 articles/74) including sitting time, sit-to-stand transitions, number of steps, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Positive effects were also observed on learning (13 articles/26) or musculoskeletal health outcomes (3 articles/8). Although many studies found no effect of these interventions, no studies report harmful interventions on these variables. The most effective strategy to reduce sedentary behaviors seems to be flexible learning spaces with adapted teaching approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that flexible learning spaces, active breaks, and active lessons effectively reduce sedentary behaviors and increase physical activity without negatively influencing academic achievement. Further studies are needed to understand better the effects of combining these interventions and their effects on children's learning and musculoskeletal health outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Activity Sedentary and Sleep BehaviorsSame topicObesity, Physical Activity, DietFrench-language works237,207