MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404896565 · doi:10.14740/ijcp536

Pericardial Decompression Syndrome in a Pediatric Patient

2024· article· en· W4404896565 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Monette Veral, Anisha Contractor, Majid Husain, Ivanna Maxson, Micah Kadden

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Clinical Pediatrics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPericarditis and Cardiac Tamponade
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDecompressionSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pericardial decompression syndrome (PDS) is a rare but critical complication of pericardial drainage. It is most associated with pericardial drainage to treat cardiac tamponade but can also occur without preceding tamponade physiology. Pericardial drainage is typically performed to relieve external compression on the heart in order to help restore normal cardiac function. In PDS, patients paradoxically develop hemodynamic instability and pulmonary edema from ventricular dysfunction after drainage of a pericardial effusion. A 4-year-old boy with history of chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) who ultimately underwent haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) required prolonged hospitalization for multiple infections and graft-versus-host disease. His clinical course was complicated by the development of a pericardial effusion for which he underwent pericardiocentesis. Shortly after the procedure, the patient developed worsening hemodynamics and pulmonary edema. Workup revealed new-onset right ventricular failure which was ultimately attributed to PDS. This case highlights PDS as a potential risk associated with pericardiocentesis in pediatric patients. Int J Clin Pediatr. 2024;13(3):105-109 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/ijcp536

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.164
Threshold uncertainty score0.441

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.371 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Clinical PediatricsSame topicPericarditis and Cardiac TamponadeFrench-language works237,207