Transmembrane protein 106B amyloid is a potential off-target molecule of tau PET tracers in the choroid plexus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Tau positron emission tomography (PET) has become an essential tool for the clinical diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases and the study of tau pathology in the brain. However, some tau tracers exhibit off-target binding in the basal ganglia, choroid plexus, and meninges. Recently, transmembrane protein 106B (TMEM106B) was identified to form novel amyloid filaments in the brain during aging. In this study, we explored the possibility that TMEM106B aggregates might be responsible for off-target binding of tau PET tracers in the choroid plexus. METHODS: F-labeled tau and amyloid tracers against choroid plexus tissues from postmortem human brains were evaluated through in vitro autoradiography and in vitro binding assays and compared with histochemical staining. RESULTS: F]flortaucipir demonstrated high affinities for collagenase A-treated choroid plexus homogenate containing transmembrane protein 106B aggregates. CONCLUSION: F]PM-PBB3 to the choroid plexus might result from binding to TMEM106B aggregates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".