Pelvic obliquity, trunk control, and motor function: an exploratory study in a non-ambulatory Duchenne muscular dystrophy cohort
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between pelvic obliquity and trunk control, spinal deformity, upper extremity functional performance, and motor function in patients with non-ambulatory Duchenne muscular dystrophy. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 21 patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy aged 8-18 years. In the study, participants' upper extremity functional levels, pelvic obliquity degrees, spinal deformity, trunk control, upper extremity performance, and motor functions were evaluated using various tools such as the Brooke Upper Extremity Functional Scale, baseline scoliometer, spinal mouse, Trunk Control Measurement Scale, Upper Extremity Performance Scale, and Egen Klassifikation Scale Version 2, respectively. RESULTS: The study found a strong correlation between pelvic obliquity and frontal spine deformity (p<0.01), as well as moderate relationships between pelvic obliquity, motor function, wheelchair usage duration, and knee flexion contractures (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The study found that pelvic obliquity may lead to spinal health deterioration and motor function limitations in non-ambulatory patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, especially those with lower extremity joint contractures and long-term wheelchair use.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".