MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404927073 · doi:10.35478/jime.2024.3.02

Duality Leadership at Atkinsrealis: From an Execution to Exploration and Growth Culture

2024· article· en· W4404927073 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fons Trompenaars, James Cullens

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Intercultural Management and Ethics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBioeconomy and Sustainability Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDuality (order theory)Organizational cultureCulture changeSociologyBusinessPolitical sciencePublic relationsAnthropologyMathematicsDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Whilst there is a wide range of interests in the many facets of leadership promoting multiple models and frameworks, the majority continue to be concerned with diagnosis, analysis, traits, and behaviours.In contrast, the authors focus on an approach that seeks to design, deliver, and embed a significant shift in organizational culture and leadership behaviour.A new metatheory of leadership is offered, combined with a change management methodology which utilizes the reconciliation of competency dilemmas as the core process.The treatment to reconciling these organizational dilemmas are culturally defined.The premise is that, by thinking and acting to reconcile competing and seemingly irreconcilable dilemmas, leaders are better able to embed change, deliver performance and be more successful cross-culturally.This theoretical approach to culture change and the related leadership metatheory is then operationalized through a case study which is founded around the Canadian engineering giant AtkinsRalis (ATRL) 1 .We explore the five "dualities" or dilemmas that AtkinsRalis leaders faced whilst trying to bridge from execution to exploration using what the authors define and explain as 'through-through thinking' to build a new way of conceiving leadership that delivers.This cultural and leadership behavioural change practice was supported through the introduction of Servant Leadership training to underpin new leadership behaviour and competencies.Further, the authors set out the practical steps to prepare for, deliver, embed, and then measure such a cultural and behavioural change over a number of years, including the HR tools, an engagement survey and interventions from the world of musical performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score0.276

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Intercultural Management and EthicsSame topicBioeconomy and Sustainability DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207