The co-chaperone DNAJA2 buffers proteasomal degradation of cytosolic proteins with missense mutations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mutations can disrupt the native function of protein by causing misfolding, which is generally handled by an intricate protein quality control network. To better understand the triaging mechanisms for misfolded cytosolic proteins, we screened a human mutation library to identify a panel of unstable mutations. The degradation of these mutated cytosolic proteins is largely dependent on the ubiquitin proteasome system. Using BioID proximity labelling, we found that the co-chaperones DNAJA1 and DNAJA2 are key interactors with one of the mutated proteins. Notably, the absence of DNAJA2 increases the turnover of the mutant but not the wild-type protein. Our work indicates that specific missense mutations in cytosolic proteins can promote enhanced interactions with molecular chaperones. Assessment of the broader panel of cytosolic mutant proteins shows that the co-chaperone DNAJA2 exhibits two distinct behaviours - acting to stabilize a wide array of cytosolic proteins, including wild-type variants, and to specifically 'buffer' some mutant proteins to reduce their turnover. Our work illustrates how distinct elements of the protein homeostasis network are utilized in the presence of a cytosolic misfolded protein.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".