MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404933030 · doi:10.1038/s41380-024-02821-0

Deciphering white matter microstructural alterations in catatonia according to ICD-11: replication and machine learning analysis

2024· article· en· W4404933030 on OpenAlexafffund
Robin Peretzke, Peter Neher, Geva A. Brandt, Stefan Fritze, Sebastian Volkmer, Jonas Daub, Georg Northoff, Jonas Bohn, Yannick Kirchhoff, Saikat Roy, Klaus Maier‐Hein, Andreas Meyer‐Lindenberg, Dušan Hirjak

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Psychiatry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftPhysicians' Services Incorporated Foundation
KeywordsCatatoniaPsychomotor learningCohortWhite matterFractional anisotropyCorpus callosumPsychologyMagnetic resonance imagingReplication (statistics)Psychomotor retardationPsychiatryMedicineInternal medicineNeuroscienceCognitionPathologyRadiologySchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Virology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Catatonia is a severe psychomotor disorder characterized by motor, affective and cognitive-behavioral abnormalities. Although previous magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies suggested white matter (WM) dysconnectivity in the pathogenesis of catatonia, it is unclear whether microstructural alterations of WM tracts connecting psychomotor regions might contribute to a better classification of catatonia patients. Here, diffusion-weighted MRI data were collected from two independent cohorts (whiteCAT/replication cohort) of patients with (n = 45/n = 13) and without (n = 56/n = 26) catatonia according to ICD-11 criteria. Catatonia severity was examined using the Northoff (NCRS) and Bush-Francis (BFCRS) Catatonia Rating Scales. We used tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS), tractometry (TractSeg) and machine-learning (ML) to classify catatonia patients from tractometry values as well as tractomics features generated by the newly developed tool RadTract. Catatonia patients showed fractional anisotropy (FA) alterations measured via TractSeg in different corpus callosum segments (CC_1, CC_3, CC_4, CC_5 and CC_6) compared to non-catatonia patients across both cohorts. Our classification results indicated a higher level of performance when trained on tractomics as opposed to traditional tractometry values. Moreover, in the CC_6, we successfully trained two classifiers using the tractomics features identified in the whiteCAT data. These classifiers were applied separately to the whiteCAT and replication cohorts, demonstrating comparable performance with Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics (AUROC) values of 0.79 for the whiteCAT cohort and 0.76 for the replication cohort. In contrast, training on FA tractometry resulted in lower AUROC values of 0.66 for the whiteCAT cohort and 0.51 for the replication cohort. In conclusion, these findings underscore the significance of CC WM microstructural alterations in the pathophysiology of catatonia. The successful use of an ML based classification model to identify catatonia patients has the potential to improve diagnostic precision.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular PsychiatrySame topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207