MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404949594 · doi:10.1186/s40635-024-00701-z

Human liver stem cells and derived extracellular vesicles protect from sepsis-induced acute lung injury and restore bone marrow myelopoiesis in a murine model of sepsis

2024· article· en· W4404949594 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea Costamagna, Chiara Pasquino, Sara Lamorte, Victor Navarro‐Tableros, Luisa Delsedime, Vito Fanelli, Giovanni Camussi, Lorenzo Del Sorbo

Bibliographic record

VenueIntensive Care Medicine Experimental · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicExtracellular vesicles in disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
FundersRegione PiemonteUniversità degli Studi di Torino
KeywordsMedicineSepsisBone marrowStem cellMesenchymal stem cellProgenitor cellHaematopoiesisEx vivoLungImmunologyIn vivoCancer researchPathologyInternal medicineBiologyCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a condition with high mortality and morbidity, characterized by deregulation of the immune response against the pathogen. Current treatment strategies rely mainly on antibiotics and supportive care. However, there is growing interest in exploring cell-based therapies as complementary approaches. Human liver stem cells (HLSCs) are pluripotent cells of mesenchymal origin, showing some advantages compared to mesenchymal stem cells in terms of immunomodulatory properties. HSLC-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) exhibited a superior efficacy profile compared to cells due to their potential to get through biological barriers and possibly to avoid tumorigenicity and showed to be effective in vivo and ex vivo models of liver and kidney disease. The potential of HLSCs and their EVs in recovering damage to distal organs due to sepsis other than the kidney remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic potential of the intravenous administration of HSLCs or HSLCs-derived EVs in a murine model of sepsis. RESULTS: Sepsis was induced by caecal ligation and puncture (CLP) on C57/BL6 mice. After CLP, mice were assigned to receive either normal saline, HLSCs or their EVs and compared to a sham group which underwent only laparotomy. Survival, persistence of bacteraemia, lung function evaluation, histology and bone marrow analysis were performed. Administration of HLSCs or HLSC-EVs resulted in improved bacterial clearance and lung function in terms of lung elastance and oedema. Naïve murine hematopoietic progenitors in bone marrow were enhanced after treatment as well. Administration of HLSCs and HLSC-EVs after CLP to significantly improved survival. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with HLSCs or HLSC-derived EVs was effective in improving acute lung injury, dysmyelopoiesis and ultimately survival in this experimental murine model of lethal sepsis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntensive Care Medicine ExperimentalSame topicExtracellular vesicles in diseaseFrench-language works237,207