MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404952370 · doi:10.1109/ojcas.2024.3509746

An Energy-Efficient Pipeline-SAR ADC Using Linearized Dynamic Amplifiers and Input Buffer in 22nm FDSOI

2024· article· en· W4404952370 on OpenAlexafffund
Bangda Yang, Trevor Caldwell, Anthony Chan Carusone

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of Circuits and Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBuffer (optical fiber)Pipeline (software)AmplifierBuffer amplifierSuccessive approximation ADCElectronic engineeringEnergy (signal processing)Computer scienceElectrical engineeringPhysicsEngineeringVoltageCMOSCapacitor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, dynamic amplifier (DA) has emerged as a popular alternative to static current closed-loop operational transconductance amplifier (OTA) due to their highly power-efficient integration-based settling, with the main limitation being their linearity performance. We present a DA that achieves −52 dB in total harmonic distortion (THD) through an analog technique by which the expanding and compressing nonlinearities in the input transistors cancel one another. A pipeline-SAR analog-to-digital converter (ADC) incorporating the linearized DA in both the input buffer and the first residue amplifier (RA) stage was designed and fabricated using the GlobalFoundries 22nm fully depleted silicon-on-insulator (FDSOI) process. Measurements showed the ADC achieved a signal-to-noise-distortion ratio (SNDR) of 37 dB at 920 MS/s consuming a total power of 1.8mW for a Walden FOM (FOMW) of 34.9 fJ/conv. With the input buffer, the achieved FOMW is 68.4 fJ/conv. The linearization technique provided a 8 dB improvement in SNDR at its optimal biasing with a negligible power overhead of approximately 5%. In general, it is expected that an 8 dB SNDR improvement would require 2.5 times the power consumption for a mismatch-limited design (Walden FOM) or 6.3 times the power for a noise-limited design (Schreier FOM).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Open Journal of Circuits and SystemsSame topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207