MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404964072 · doi:10.1080/10903127.2024.2437813

Factors Influencing Analgesic Use During Transport of Intubated Pediatric Patients

2024· article· en· W4404964072 on OpenAlexafffund
Alexandre Déragon, Grant Scollay, Nicholas Barrowman, Lamia Hayawi, Russell D. MacDonald, Candice McGahern, Maala Bhatt, Fuad Alnaji

Bibliographic record

VenuePrehospital Emergency Care · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science CentreHealth Sciences CentreChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
FundersChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Foundation
KeywordsMedicineAnalgesicAnesthesiaEmergency medicineIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Critically ill children undergo painful procedures during resuscitation and stabilization before and during interfacility transport. The literature supporting pain management in this unique environment focuses predominantly on isolated traumatic injuries. Timely administration of analgesia can improve patient well-being by attenuating stress responses and reducing severe adverse events. To determine the prevalence of analgesia administration among pediatric patients undergoing mechanical ventilation during transport and to identify associated factors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic patient records from a large critical care transport system in North America, between 2014 and 2018. We included sequential pediatric patients who were intubated and mechanically ventilated. We examined analgesia administration (with opioids or ketamine) administered by paramedics. Adverse events were examined in relation to analgesia administration. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with in-transport analgesia administration. RESULTS: Of 903 patients (median age 9.1 years), 770 (85.3%) received analgesia during transport, with 83.3% receiving opioids or ketamine. Patients without opiate or ketamine analgesia during transport experienced higher rates of hypotension (38.4% vs. 26.9%) and hypoxemia (29.1% vs. 22.1%). Factors significantly associated with opiate or ketamine use included the reason for transport, transport duration, paralytic use, and pre-transport opiate or ketamine administration. Patients with comorbidities were less likely to receive analgesia during transport. CONCLUSIONS: This study's findings highlight the need for improved pain evaluation in caring for mechanically ventilated pediatric patients during transport. Factors such as transport, duration, the reason for transport, pre-transport opiate or ketamine administration, and paralytics increase the likelihood of analgesia administration. At the same time, the presence of comorbidities decreases the likelihood. The study underscores the importance of improved documentation of pain to inform analgesic choices and administration with the ultimate goal of reducing adverse events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePrehospital Emergency CareSame topicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersFrench-language works237,207