Ellipsoidal K-Means: An Automatic Clustering Approach for Non-Uniform Data Distributions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traditional K-means clustering assumes, to some extent, a uniform distribution of data around predefined centroids, which limits its effectiveness for many realistic datasets. In this paper, a new clustering technique, simulated-annealing-based ellipsoidal clustering (SAELLC), is proposed to automatically partition data into an optimal number of ellipsoidal clusters, a capability absent in traditional methods. SAELLC transforms each identified cluster into a hyperspherical cluster, where the diameter of the hypersphere equals the minor axis of the original ellipsoid, and the center is encoded to represent the entire cluster. During the assignment of points to clusters, local ellipsoidal properties are independently considered. For objective function evaluation, the method adaptively transforms these ellipsoidal clusters into a variable number of global clusters. Two objective functions are simultaneously optimized: one reflecting partition compactness using the silhouette function (SF) and Euclidean distance, and another addressing cluster connectedness through a nearest-neighbor algorithm. This optimization is achieved using a newly-developed multiobjective simulated annealing approach. SAELLC is designed to automatically determine the optimal number of clusters, achieve precise partitioning, and accommodate a wide range of cluster shapes, including spherical, ellipsoidal, and non-symmetric forms. Extensive experiments conducted on UCI datasets demonstrated SAELLC’s superior performance compared to six well-known clustering algorithms. The results highlight its remarkable ability to handle diverse data distributions and automatically identify the optimal number of clusters, making it a robust choice for advanced clustering analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it