Thematic issue: Overgange i flersprogethedsdidaktikken. Transitions in plurilingual education. Transitions dans l’éducation plurilingue
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dette NJLTL-særnummer samler bidrag fra forskere og praktikere, der beskæftiger sig med overgange i flersprogethedsdidaktikken i den nordiske kontekst og andre kontekster. Vores call for paper pointerede, at vi var særligt interesserede i bidrag om flersprogethedsdidaktik med fokus på overgange, progression og brydninger mellem førskole, grundskole, ungdomsuddannelse og videregående uddannelse (vertikale overgange). Desuden fremhævede vi, at vi var interesserede i bidrag, der analyserer og diskuterer potentialer og udfordringer i forbindelse med flersprogethedsdidaktikken i overgangen mellem formelle og ikke-formelle kontekster samt integrationen af elevernes hjemmesprog i uddannelserne (horisontale overgange). Fem underemner har sat rammerne for fremsendelsen af abstracts, som blev struktureret ud fra det respektive undersøgelsesniveau ved at skelne mellem et nano-, mikro-, meso-, makro- og supraniveau. Artiklerne i dette særnummer fokuserer således på vertikale og horisontale overgange i forskellige kontekster og dækker alle fem underemner. Nogle artikler tager højde for samspillet mellem niveauerne. Artiklerne er skrevet på dansk, engelsk, fransk, norsk og tysk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.012 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.147 | 0.028 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".