MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404989613 · doi:10.1111/vco.13032

Do Pre‐Treatment Biopsy Characteristics Predict Early Tumour Progression in Feline Diffuse Large B Cell Nasal Lymphoma Treated With Radiotherapy?

2024· article· en· W4404989613 on OpenAlexaff
Valérie J. Poirier, Valeria Meier, Michelle Turek, Neil Christensen, Jacqueline Bowal, Matthew D. Ponzini, Stefan M. Keller

Bibliographic record

VenueVeterinary and Comparative Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVeterinary Oncology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesUniversity of California, DavisCenter for Companion Animal Health, University of California, DavisNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsMedicineLymphomaMitotic indexBiopsyCD20ChemotherapyPathologyNon-Hodgkin's lymphomaHazard ratioPopulationProgression-free survivalRadiation therapyNasal cavityInternal medicineConfidence intervalSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The standard of care treatment for localised feline nasal lymphoma (FeNL) is radiation therapy (RT). Early local or systemic failure occurs in 17%-45% of cats treated with RT with or without chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to determine if pre-treatment biopsy characteristics could predict early tumour progression in FeNL. Inclusion criteria consisted of histologically confirmed FeNL, available paraffin blocks of diagnostic quality, localised to the sinonasal cavity on staging pre-RT, treated with IMRT/IGRT (10 × 4.2 Gy) without chemotherapy and at least 1 year follow-up. All pre-RT biopsies were reviewed and evaluated with CD3, CD20, CD79a, pan-CK and Ki-67 immunohistochemistry and the mitotic activity index was determined. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 1 year and hazard-ratios (HR) with confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Twenty-eight cats fit the inclusion criteria, and all had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Seventeen cats (61%) were progression free at 1 year. Of the 11 cats that progressed in the first year, two had local progression, two had both local and systemic progression and seven had systemic progression. The mitotic index (HR: 1.03, CI 0.9-1.19, p = 0.645), Ki-67 (HR: 1.00, CI 0.98-1.02, p = 0.845) and > 30% of tumour-infiltrating T cells (HR: 0.38, CI 0.09-1.56, p = 0.175) were not significantly associated with PFS. In this uniformly RT treated population of FeNL, none of the evaluated pre-RT histologic parameters could predict early treatment failure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVeterinary and Comparative OncologySame topicVeterinary Oncology ResearchFrench-language works237,207