MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404991905 · doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.11.033

Zenker per-oral endoscopic myotomy (Z-POEM): The ideal first-line therapy for treatment of Zenker diverticulum

2024· article· en· W4404991905 on OpenAlexaff
Vaibhav Gupta, Stephen Gowing, Ahmad Khoja, S M Mahmudul Hasan, Sean Higgins, Richard Liu, Biniam Kidane

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDysphagia Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsResearch ManitobaMemorial University of NewfoundlandUniversity of ManitobaWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZenker's diverticulumMyotomyMedicineDiverticulum (mollusc)Ideal (ethics)SurgeryAchalasiaPhilosophyEsophagusDysphagia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Zenker diverticulum is a mucosal herniation at the pharyngoesophageal junction. Although open surgical myotomy is the conventional treatment, robust evidence on third-space flexible endoscopic myotomy is lacking. We assessed safety, effectiveness, and patient-reported outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (Z-POEM) in the largest reported single-center experience with this technique. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed of consecutive patients undergoing Z-POEM in a tertiary hospital thoracic surgery practice from 2018 to 2024. Data collected included demographics, comorbidities, clinical and radiographic (pre/postoperative esophagram) outcomes, and validated patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes (Dakkak and Eckardt scores). Descriptive analyses were used to describe the population, outcomes, and complications. Aggregate and individual-patient symptom trajectories were charted over time. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients (57.9% female, n = 33) with a mean age of 74 years underwent Z-POEM. Median diverticulum size was 2 cm (interquartile range, 2-3). All patients reported subjective symptom improvement and showed complete resolution of obstructed barium flow on postoperative esophagrams. At median follow-up of 9 months, all patients who underwent Z-POEM reported clinically important improvements in objective symptom scores, with symptom trajectories showing rapid and durable improvement up to 5 years postoperatively. Four patients (7%) experienced complications. The majority of the cohort (66.7%) was unsuitable for rigid stapled myotomy, mainly as the result of short diverticulum or limited neck/mouth movement. No patients required repeat myotomy. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate significant and sustained relief of patient-reported outcomes/symptoms after Z-POEM, including for small diverticuli, with low complication rates. Its safety and versatility has made it the new standard of care locally; Z-POEM can be adopted by third-space endoscopy-trained thoracic surgeons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.900
Threshold uncertainty score0.511

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgerySame topicDysphagia Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207