Broadening mechanisms of donor-bound exciton photoluminescence in Ga-doped ZnO nanowires
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Donor spins in ZnO NWs have promise for quantum information (QI) applications due to high crystalline quality, narrow excitonic luminescence linewidths, and a direct bandgap of this material. It is important to understand the processes that can lead to inhomogeneous broadening of the excitonic transitions for realization of QI devices. We investigate the effect of Ga dopant concentration on the low temperature photoluminescence (PL) of Ga-doped ZnO nanowires. Spectrometer-resolution-limited donor-bound exciton (D0X) PL lines are observed at low concentrations with linewidths of around 0.1 meV. A clear increase in the Ga D0X line is observed as trace amounts of Ga are added. Above a certain concentration threshold, we observe a strong increase in the lateral growth coupled with a significant tail on the low energy side of the D0X emission, which scales linearly with dopant precursor concentration. We have analyzed this behavior using different models, including a model based on a bound exciton wavefunction overlap with neigbhouring donors and a Stark effect model due to random charged impurities. We rule out both of these models based on PL excitation spectroscopy measurements and show that a simple exponential model of the Urbach form gives the best fit and points to disorder in the more heavily doped shells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".