Nurses’ experiences in transitioning to work in the long-term care and home and community care sectors: A phenomenological exploration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nurses in long-term care (LTC) and home and community care (HCC) are well acquainted with the high workloads and manifold job stressors that pervade these sectors, making it increasingly difficult to employ and retain a strong workforce. In response, nursing bridging education programs have been proposed to enhance recruitment and retention. While the efficacy of such programs is supported, the transition to practice experience of new nurse graduates is often associated with feelings of under-preparedness. Understanding the lived experience of nurses transitioning into new roles in LTC and HCC after completing a bridging program may highlight areas of emphasis for future retention efforts. METHODS: Hermeneutic phenomenology was employed to explore the experiences of new graduate Registered Practical Nurses (RPNs) and Registered Nurses (RNs) from a tuition reimbursement program supporting students enrolled in nursing bridging education from Personal Support Worker (PSW) to RPN/RN and/or RPN to RN in Ontario as they transitioned to practice within LTC and HCC. A series of in-depth semi-structured virtual interviews and iterative analysis explored the meaning of everyday experiences for nurse participants. RESULTS: From twenty individual interviews (12 initial, 8 follow-up), the experience was embedded in a sense of fulfillment, further considered through four themes - benevolence; growth, eagerness, and anticipation to learn; building from within; and work-life balance. DISCUSSION: This is the first phenomenological study to report on the meaning of the experience of transitioning to practice for new graduate nurses from bridging education programs as they (re)enter the workforce in LTC and HCC, offering rich insight into their experiences when moving into new roles. CONCLUSIONS: By illuminating the nuances of this experience, the findings may encourage healthcare leaders to develop helpful policies, strategies, and workplace cultures in LTC and HCC that might better promote the recruitment and retention of nurses in these sectors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".