MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405003321 · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ace76b

The JCMT Legacy Release: SCUBA-2 850 μm Coadds and Catalogs

2024· article· en· W4405003321 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sarah Graves, J. T. Dempsey, Graham Bell, David Berry, I. M. Coulson, M. J. Currie, Per Friberg, Tim Jenness, Doug Johnstone, Junhao Liu, Steve Mairs, Harriet Parsons, Mark G. Rawlings, H. Thomas, J. G. A. Wouterloot

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersScience and Technology Facilities Council
KeywordsJames Clerk Maxwell TelescopePhysicsSkyBolometerAstrophysicsTelescopeCalibrationMaximaStandard deviationRadio telescopeNoise (video)Flux (metallurgy)AstronomyRemote sensingOpticsGalaxyComputer scienceGeologyStar formation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT) 850 μm Legacy Release, containing uniformly reduced, coadded tiles, and catalogs of detected emission, for the 850 μm data from all Submillimetre Common User Bolometer Array 2 (SCUBA-2) observations taken between 2011 February 2 and 2020 August 1. This release provides the fastest and easiest way to identify uniformly determined 850 μm detections and calibrated fluxes for any position observed by the JCMT. The coadded observations include 11,722 hr of observing time and cover 1516 square degrees of the sky, with detections of contiguous areas of emission at better than 5σ covering 2.46 square degrees of area. Within these regions 21,059 individual local maxima were detected. Fifteen tiles contain regions with a noise level better than 0.0025 mJy arcsec−2. The data are gridded onto HEALPix tiles of ≈1° a side, using the HEALPix projection with pixels of size ≈3.″22. The coadds have been calibrated into units of mJy arcsec−2 using the standard date-varying SCUBA-2 flux-conversion factor (FCF) from Mairs et al. (2021). We then examined the accuracy of this calibration for our data set by calculating self-derived FCF values for our two most-used standard sources, finding a result within the expected errors but with a larger standard deviation of 9%. The coadds and catalogs can be searched and retrieved via the Canadian Astronomy Data Centre (project code: JCMT-LR). Combined catalogs of all detected regions and of all local maxima can be downloaded from the Canadian Advanced Network for Astronomy Research Data Publication Service (doi: 10.11570/23.0013 ), along with masks showing the full area observed in this release and the full area of detected emission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.029

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement SeriesSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207