MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405007001 · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2024.109416

Ammonia emissions from urea fertilization – Multi-annual micrometeorological measurements across Germany

2024· article· en· W4405007001 on OpenAlexaff
Björn Kemmann, Julian Brokötter, Hans‐Jürgen Götze, Alexander Kelsch, Jonas Frößl, S. Riesch, Paul Heinemann, Sina Kukowski, Andreas Pacholski, Heinz Flessa

Bibliographic record

VenueAgriculture Ecosystems & Environment · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersBundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und ErnährungLandwirtschaftliche Rentenbank
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceAmmoniaUreaAtmospheric sciencesHuman fertilizationEnvironmental chemistryAgronomyChemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Among the synthetic fertilizers used in crop production, the application of conventional urea is one of the major sources of ammonia (NH 3 ) emissions. However, NH 3 emission estimates based on existing emission factors (EFs) are subject to significant uncertainties due to limited underlying data, obtained under various conditions and applied methods. To assess the accuracy of current EFs for different regions within Germany, NH₃ emissions were measured using the integrated horizontal flux (IHF) method employing ALPHA passive samplers following urea application in 2021, 2022, and 2023 across six agroecological regions of Germany. Measurements were conducted under winter wheat cropping, with total nitrogen (N) rates of 145–230 kg N ha⁻¹ , split into two or three applications, resulting in 51 measurement campaigns. Measured N input related NH 3 emission (NH 3Ninput ) ranged from 1.1 % to 20.7 % (median 4.8 %, mean 8.5 %), significantly lower than the 2019 IPCC (14.2 %) and 2023 EMEP (16.1 % for pH<7) estimates for urea. No consistent trend in NH 3Ninput was observed between fertilizer applications and regions, though NH 3Ninput tended to be higher at sites with higher sand contents than sites with higher clay contents. Rainfall was negatively correlated with NH 3Ninput , while N application rates had no effect. The current EFs overestimate the NH 3 emissions from urea applied to winter wheat under the conditions tested in Germany. The observed emissions may deviate from long-term regional trends due to inter-annual variability and complex environmental interactions. Nevertheless, establishing a national EF for Germany could enhance the accuracy of NH₃ emission estimates and improve assessments of mitigation measures' potential to reduce emissions. • Micrometeorological NH 3 measurements across six agroecological regions in Germany. • Median N input related NH 3 Emission across Germany was 4.8 %. • Rainfall reduced NH₃ emissions, whereas increased sand content enhanced them. • No consistent trends or differences in NH 3 emissions between regions in Germany. • NH 3 Emissions in Germany were below current IPCC and EMEP emission factors for urea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.767
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgriculture Ecosystems & EnvironmentSame topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosolsFrench-language works237,207