MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405008028 · doi:10.1016/j.jncc.2024.12.001

Integrated molecular characterization reveals the pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies of pulmonary blastoma

2024· article· en· W4405008028 on OpenAlexfundno aff
He Tian, Junhui Yang, Ying Chen, Lin Li, Tao Fan, Tiejun Liu, Guangyu Bai, Yibo Gao, Jie He

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the National Cancer Center · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJewish General Hospital
KeywordsPathogenesisPulmonary BlastomaMedicinePathologyInternal medicineLung

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Pulmonary blastoma (PB) is a rare subtype of lung cancer. Currently, the underlying pathogenesis mechanisms of PB have not been fully illustrated, and the therapeutic approach for this entity is limited. Methods: Whole-exome sequencing (WES), RNA sequencing, and DNA methylation profiling are applied to seven PB patients. Multi-omics data of pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) and pituitary blastoma (PitB) from previous studies are invoked to illuminate the associations among PB and these malignacies. Results: alterations, Wnt signaling pathway dysregulation and IGF2 imprinting dysregulation are the potential pathogenesis mechanisms of PB. Moreover, we reveal that the integrated molecular features of PB are distinct from PSC, and the molecular characteristics of PB are more similar to PitB than to PSC. Pancancer analysis show that the tumor mutation burden (TMB) and leukocyte fraction (LF) of PB are low, while some cases are positive for PD-L1 or have CD8-positive focal areas, implying the potential applicability of immunotherapy in selected PB patients. Conclusion: This study depicts the integrated molecular characteristics of PB and offers novel insights into the pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies of PB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score0.149

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the National Cancer CenterSame topicCongenital Diaphragmatic Hernia StudiesFrench-language works237,207