Two-in-One Solution: Simultaneously Enhancing Security and Privacy for Data-Driven Models in Mobile Edge Computing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Data-driven models are widely employed in Mobile Edge Computing to satisfy the demands of Emerging Consumer Applications. However, previous work demonstrates that data-driven models are susceptible to security threats like Backdoor and Evasion Attacks or privacy threats like Membership Inference Attacks. Numerous existing methods for mitigating these threats have been proposed. However, these methods focus solely on enhancing model security or only on improving model privacy. Ideally, data-driven models should enhance model security and privacy simultaneously. In this paper, we propose methods that combine individual security-enhancing and privacy-enhancing methods to mitigate the security and privacy threats of data-driven models simultaneously. We evaluate the effectiveness of individual security-enhancing methods, individual privacy-enhancing methods, and our methods in simultaneously enhancing model security and privacy. Our comprehensive experimental analysis reveals two-fold insights. First, individual security-enhancing methods can either enhance or diminish model privacy, while individual privacy-enhancing methods face challenges in enhancing model security. Second, our methods improve the effectiveness of simultaneously enhancing model security and privacy compared to the individual methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it