MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405022452 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2024.3506014

Pd-Loaded MoS<sub>2</sub> Nanoflowers for Enhanced Room-Temperature Methanol Sensing

2024· article· en· W4405022452 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Vikash Kumar, Chandrabhan Patel, Sumit Chaudhary, Ajit Yadav, Poonam Bajoria, Rajour Tanyi Ako, Sharath Sriram, Shaibal Mukherjee

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Innovation and Advanced Education
KeywordsMaterials scienceTemperature measurementMethanolOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyChemistryPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid increase in environmental pollution has created a critical need for the highly sensitive detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). These compounds play a vital role across various sectors, spanning industries, such as healthcare, environmental surveillance, as well as the food and agriculture sectors. Pristine MoS2 and (1%, 2%, and 4%) Pd-loaded MoS2 are produced through a simple hydrothermal synthesis technique. Surface morphology, crystal structure, elemental composition, and surface area were thoroughly analyzed. The sensing performance of the synthesized pristine MoS2 and Pd-loaded MoS2 nanoflowers under dynamic flow gas sensing setup at room temperature has been analysed. The 2% Pd-loaded MoS2 exhibits 6.5 times response (65%) as compare to pristine MoS2 response (10%) to 100-ppm methanol exposure. Furthermore, the 2% Pd-loaded MoS2 sensor exhibits 6.6 ppb of limit of detection (LoD) and 21.7 ppb of limit of qualification (LoQ) values. The fabricated sensor has rapid transient performance having 35 s and 43.2 s response and recovery time, respectively. The fabricated 2% Pd-loaded MoS2 sensor exhibits excellent reproducibility, repeatability, and ultraselective behavior toward methanol gas in order to avoid the interference in the measurement by other gases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Sensors JournalSame topicGas Sensing Nanomaterials and SensorsFrench-language works237,207