Strong stationarity for non-smooth control problems with fractional semi-linear elliptic equations in dimension $$N\le 3$$
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, we investigate the optimal control of a semi-linear fractional PDEs involving the spectral diffusion operator, or the realization of the integral fractional Laplace operator with the zero Dirichlet exterior condition, both of order s with $$s\in (0,1)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>s</mml:mi> <mml:mo>∈</mml:mo> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . The state equation contains a non-smooth nonlinearity, and the objective functional is convex in the control variable but contains non-smooth terms. As the mappings involved may not be Gâteaux differentiable, we use a regularization technique to regularize these nonlinear terms, aiming to obtain Gâteaux differentiable mappings. By employing this regularization technique, we are able to derive the first-order optimality condition for the regularized control problem by using the associated adjoint system. Furthermore, we conduct a limit analysis on the regularized term resulting in an optimality system for the non-smooth problem of C-stationary type. Subsequently, we establish a primal optimality condition, specifically B-stationarity. Under the assumption of “constraint qualification”, we derive the strong stationarity conditions for the non-smooth optimization problem with control constraints and establish the equivalence between B-stationarity and strong stationarity conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it