MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405034713 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-205583

Comparing Estimated Glomerular Filtration (eGFR) Equations in Patients with Transfusion-Dependent Thalassemia

2024· article· en· W4405034713 on OpenAlexaff
Olubunmi Ogunsanya, Amrit Kirpalani, Jennifer Zavitz, Ashley V. Geerlinks, Soumitra Tole

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenal functionCystatin CMedicineCreatinineUrologyThalassemiaNephrotoxicityInternal medicineGastroenterologyKidney

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Renal dysfunction is a well-described complication in children with transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT), and is linked to chronic anemia, hypoxia, hemolysis as well as nephrotoxicity from free iron and chelating agents. Nuclear medicine-based (DTPA) measurement of glomerular filtration rate (nmGFR) remains the gold standard test of renal function but is expensive, invasive and unsuitable for routine screening. Creatinine is the most used biomarker for renal function but is less accurate in children and those with low muscle mass. Cystatin C has been widely adopted as a more accurate marker but can be affected by iron chelation therapy. While early detection of renal dysfunction is important to guide management, there remain limited data on the most reliable method to estimate eGFR in children with TDT. We designed a single-center retrospective cohort study to explore the correlation between nmGFR and eGFR equations based on creatinine, cystatin C, or both. Patients with TDT aged 0-17 years who had a nmDTPA study and serum cystatin C between 2013-2023 were included. Cystatin C measurements taken on the same day or up to 7 days from their DTPA scan were used. Eight eGFR calculations were performed (Schwartz, Schwartz-Lyon, Cr CKID U25, Filler, CysC Zapatelli, CysC CKID U25, Cr-CysC Zapatelli, Cr-CysC CKID U25). The Pearson correlation (rho) was used to measure the correlation of each eGFR equation versus the nmGFR. Mean bias (95% confidence intervals, CI) was calculated using the Bland-Altman method assuming constant variance. Eleven children (55% female) with TDT (73% β0/β0 or β0/β+, 9% E0/β0, 18% non-deletional alpha thalassemia) with median age of 13 years were included. Nine (82%) children were receiving deferasirox for iron chelation, one (9%) was receiving deferoxamine and one (9%) was being phlebotomized having undergone a hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Two (18%) children were concurrently receiving hydroxyurea. The mean nmGFR was 94.1+/-20.9 mL/min/1.73 m2, 72.3% had a normal nmGFR > 90 mL/min/1.73 m2. The Cr-CysC CKID U25 equation showed the strongest correlation to nmGFR (rho=0.84, p=0.002) with the lowest risk of bias (-3.01, 95% CI -28.5-25.1). The Cr CKID U25 and CysC CKID U25 equations showed moderate correlations [(rho=0.61, p=0.045) and (rho=0.64, p=0.047)] but showed significant bias [(-21.8, 95% CI -58.1-14.6) and (19.2, 95% CI -10.3 - 48.7)]. The Schwartz, Schwartz-Lyon, Filler, CysC Zapatelli, Cr-CysC Zapatelli equations did not correlate well with the nmGFR. Most commonly used eGFR calculations poorly estimate renal function in children with transfusion-dependent thalassemia. The Cr-CysC CKID U25 equation showed strong correlation with the nmGFR and may represent a better biomarker for renal dysfunction in this population. A large prospective cohort study is needed to confirm and validate these findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersFrench-language works237,207