MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405037080 · doi:10.62641/aep.v52i6.1743

Association between Visceral Fat Content and Obesity-Related Indicators with Cognitive Impairment after Intracerebral Hemorrhage

2024· article· en· W4405037080 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yuchen Wang, Xutong Zhu, Xin Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueActas Españolas de Psiquiatría · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsIntracerebral hemorrhageAssociation (psychology)ObesityCognitive impairmentMedicineVisceral fatInternal medicineCognitionPsychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, often leading to long-term cognitive impairment that significantly diminishes the quality of life. This study investigated the relationship between visceral fat content, obesity-related indicators, and cognitive dysfunction following ICH. METHODS: A total of 388 subjects with ICH who were admitted to the Neurosurgery Department of the Hospital and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in this study. Obesity-related indicators, including body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), were measured. L3 level images were obtained by abdominal computerized tomography (CT). The visceral fat content was estimated using IMAGE J software, and adiponectin levels were assessed via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was used to evaluate the cognitive level of patients within 2 weeks of onset, and the shortened version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (miniMoCA) was used to evaluate the cognitive level of patients 6 months after ICH. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to analyze the correlations of BMI, WC, WHtR, abdominal fat, and adiponectin with cognitive impairment after ICH. RESULTS: BMI, WC, and WHtR were lower in the cognitive impairment group (p < 0.01). Overweight patients exhibited higher MMSE scores than normal-weight patients (p < 0.05) and higher miniMoCA scores than obese patients (p = 0.014). Abdominal obesity, assessed by WC and WHtR, was associated with higher MMSE scores (p = 0.022 and 0.003, respectively). Multivariate analysis indicated that WHtR was associated with cognitive impairment risk post-ICH (odds ratio (OR) = 0.233, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.071, 0.762); p = 0.016). Although no overall association was found between adiponectin levels and cognitive impairment, subgroup analysis revealed lower adiponectin levels in overweight patients with cognitive impairment (p = 0.040). CONCLUSION: WHtR is independently and inversely associated with cognitive impairment after ICH. There is no significant correlation between adiponectin with cognitive impairment after ICH, while subgroup analysis indicates that adiponectin levels are lower in overweight patients with cognitive impairment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActas Españolas de PsiquiatríaSame topicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchFrench-language works237,207