MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405041009 · doi:10.1016/j.geomat.2024.100041

Development and application of the GATSI in measuring tourism sustainability in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh

2024· article· en· W4405041009 on OpenAlex
Adeeb Hossain, Rifat Islam, Tamanna Yesmin, Habibul Hasan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGEOMATICA · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismSustainabilityGeographyEnvironmental planningArchaeologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cox's Bazar, home to the world's longest natural beach and a critical tourist hub in Bangladesh, faces significant environmental and socio-economic challenges due to its heavy reliance on tourism. Addressing the lack of spatial adaptability and integrated indicators in current sustainability measures, this study develops and applies the Geospatially Adaptive Tourism Sustainability Index (GATSI) to enable the assessment and visualization of tourism sustainability at both site-specific and broader scales. The index incorporates 30 economic, environmental, socio-cultural, and peripheral indicators aligned with the Bangladesh Tourism Board's functions. Data were collected through a closed-ended questionnaire survey, combining random sampling for broad representation and purposive sampling for in-depth insights, with measures to mitigate biases. Using the Suitability Modeler in ArcGIS Pro, single-value mean ratings were interpolated, revealing spatial variability in sustainability performance across the region. Economic and environmental indicators scored well in central and northern areas, likely due to better infrastructure, while socio-cultural and peripheral indicators highlighted governance and community engagement gaps. The GATSI values ranged from 1.43 to 4, classified into thresholds: extremely low (1.43–1.8), low (1.8–2.6), medium (2.6–3.4), and high (3.4–4.0). The average GATSI of 2.63 indicates medium sustainability, with island and sanctuary & parks demonstrating moderate levels, while cultural and nature-based tourism scored poorly. Although limited by seasonality, this study provides actionable insights for targeted policymaking and resource allocation and offers a replicable framework for other regions facing similar challenges. • Economic and environmental indicators generally performed well in central and northern areas, but socio-cultural and peripheral aspects needed improvement. • The GATSI values varied widely, from 1.43 (extremely low) to 4.00 (high) and an average of 2.63, indicating medium sustainability in Cox's Bazar. • Island, sanctuary & park tourism had moderate sustainability levels, while other types, such as nature-based, historical, and beach tourism, showed low to extremely low sustainability levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.616
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it