MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4405042174 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-200018

Glofitamab Induces High Response Rates and Durable Remissions in Patients (Pts) with Heavily Pretreated Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL), Including Those with a Poor Prognosis: Subgroup Results from a Phase I/II Study

2024· article· en· W4405042174 on OpenAlexaff
Tycel Phillips, Marek Trněný, Carmelo Carlo‐Stella, Jan Maciej Zaucha, Tomasz Wróbel, Fritz Offner, Michael Dickinson, Monica Tani, Michael Crump, Nancy L. Bartlett, Joaquín Martínez‐López, Paolo Corradini, Estefania Mulvihill, Alessia Bottos, Derrick Kaufman, James Relf, Fabiola Bene Tchaleu, Alexandra Bazeos, Linda Lundberg, Franck Morschhauser

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMantle cell lymphomaMedicineRefractory (planetary science)Internal medicineLymphomaOncologyGastroenterologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Pts with R/R MCL continue to have a poor prognosis, especially those whose disease has become R/R to Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi)-containing therapies. Additional treatments are needed for pts with R/R MCL. Glofitamab is a CD20xCD3 T-cell-engaging bispecific antibody that is approved for the treatment of pts with R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who have received ≥2 prior lines of therapy. In an ongoing Phase I/II study (NP30179; NCT03075696), fixed-duration glofitamab monotherapy induced high response rates and durable remissions, and had a manageable safety profile, in heavily pretreated pts with R/R MCL (Phillips et al. ASCO 2024). We report updated results for the R/R MCL cohort, including efficacy in clinically and/or histologically defined high-risk subgroups, as well as initial analysis of minimal residual disease (MRD). Methods: Eligible pts were those with R/R MCL who had received ≥1 prior line of therapy. All pts received obinutuzumab pretreatment (1000mg or 2000mg) on Cycle (C) 1 Day (D) 1. Glofitamab was then given as step up doses on C1D8 (2.5mg) and C1D15 (10mg) and at the target dose (16mg or 30mg) on D1 of each subsequent cycle (C2-12). Investigators assessed the tumor response using Lugano 2014 criteria. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor biopsies were classified as classical, blastoid or pleomorphic and analyzed by immunohistochemistry for Ki-67 or p53 expression. MRD was evaluated in genomic or plasma DNA by clonoSEQ. Results: As of May 17, 2024, 60 pts received treatment (safety population; median age: 72 years, range: 41-86). Most pts (86.7%) had Ann Arbor stage III or IV disease at entry. The median number of prior lines of therapy was 2 (range: 1-5); 46.7% of pts had received ≥3 prior therapies and 55.0% had received ≥1 prior BTKi therapy. The majority of pts (73.3%) were refractory to their last prior therapy and 51.7% were refractory to any prior BTKi. Among pts with an evaluable baseline biopsy, 53.0% (25/46) had ≥1 high-risk histological feature, defined as blastoid morphology, Ki-67 expression >50% or p53 expression >50%. Median overall survival (OS) follow-up was 24.2 months (range: 0-50) at cut-off. In the intent-to-treat population of all enrolled pts (N=61), the overall response rate was 82% and complete response (CR) rate was 77%. Median time to response was 42 days (range: 29-164) and median duration of CR (DOCR) was 46.5 months (range: 1-47), with 57.4% of complete responders still in response at cut-off. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18.0 months (95% CI: 11.3, not estimable [NE]) and median OS was NE (95% CI: 21.6, NE). Response rates were consistent in patient subgroups defined by baseline clinical characteristics. CR rates were: 76% and 78% in those aged <70 (n=25) and ≥70 (n=36) years; 80%, 78%, and 75% in those with 1 (n=15), 2 (n=18) and ≥3 (n=28) prior lines of therapy; 71% and 85% in those with (n=34) and without (n=27) prior BTKi exposure; and 76% and 81% in those who were (n=45) and were not (n=16) refractory to their last prior therapy, respectively. Among pts with an evaluable baseline biopsy, CR rates were 68.0% and 81.0% in those with (n=25) and without (n=21) ≥1 high-risk features. In detail, CR rates were: 60% and 73% in those with (n=5) and without (n=37) blastoid morphology; 68% and 78% in those with (n=19) and without (n=27) Ki-67 expression >50%; and 67% and 76% in those with (n=9) and without (n=37) p53 expression >50%. Median DOCRs in those with or without ≥1 high-risk features were 21.5 months (95% CI: 17.7, NE) and 19.2 months (95% CI:17.4, 42.8), respectively. Landmark analyses indicated that most pts who were in CR at end of treatment (EOT) were progression free and alive at 18 months after EOT (PFS rate: 71.8%; OS rate: 83.0%). A trackable MRD clone was identified in 17/31 (54.8%) pts in CR at EOT. Among these pts, 11/12 (91.6%) with evaluable samples had undetectable MRD at C3. Exploratory data on B-cell recovery and Ig levels after EOT will be presented. No new or unexpected safety signals were reported. Conclusions: Glofitamab induces high response rates in pts with heavily pretreated R/R MCL, including those who have clinical and/or histological features associated with poor prognosis. Clinical and molecular remissions are achieved early in the course of treatment, with durable responses lasting beyond the length of the treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→