MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405045661 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-198896

Distinguishing Germline from Acquired Pathogenic <i>CSF3R</i> Variants: Key Diagnostic Features and Clinical Implications

2024· article· en· W4405045661 on OpenAlexaffabout
Janick Caron-L'Ecuyer, Michaël Harnois, Marie‐Christine Meunier, Vincent Éthier, Genevieve Huynh-Trudeau, Lissa Ajjamada, Lambert Busque, Natasha Szuber

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes
Canadian institutionsHôpital Charles-Le MoyneCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontMPB Technologies & Communications (Canada)Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermlineBiologyMedicineGeneticsImmunologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Neutrophilia is a common clinical finding. Conversely, chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) is a rare myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with mutations in colony stimulating factor receptor (CSF3R), classically CSF3R T618I (Maxson, 2013). Increased genomic testing has yielded higher rates of identification of CSF3R mutations. Novel germline variants have been described, some predisposing to hematologic malignancies (Trottier, 2020), though data on the clinical significance of non-canonical CSF3R subtypes, including germline (G-CSF3R), are limited. We aimed to characterize phenotypes and outcomes in a CSF3R-mutated series to expose the distinct clinical impact of individual variants. Methods This multicenter retrospective/prospective study evaluated patients with a CSF3R mutation identifiedbetween 2019-2022 (centralized laboratory in Quebec). Testing was performed using Sanger sequencing or NGS (42-gene myeloid panel). Clinical data was abstracted from patient records (IRB approval). Conventional statistical methods were used (JMP® Pro 14.1.0; SAS Institute, NC, USA). Results Between 2019 and 2022, 35 of 323 (10.8%) patients who underwent CSF3R mutational testing resulted positive. Of those, n=17 had informative laboratory and clinical data available. The cohort included: T618I (n=8; 47%), E835K (4; 23%), G683R (2; 12%) and M696T (3; 18%). Of the 9 non-T618I mutations, 6 were identified as germline via buccal swab sampling, and an additional 3 were strongly suspected germline on account of VAF exactly 50% with long-standing neutrophilia. Reasons for testing: G-CSF3R: 33% neutrophilia; 67% thrombocytosis or incidental; T618I: 100% neutrophilia and/or other. Seven of 8 patients with T618I mutations (88%) had an ICC-defined diagnosis of CNL, compared to none of those with G-CSF3R (0%). Phenotypes: G-CSF3R vs CSF3R-T618I Subjects with G-CSF3R mutations vs T618I presented a distinct phenotype: absence of splenomegaly (0 vs 50%; p=0.006) and constitutional symptoms at diagnosis (0 vs 75%; p=0.0003). They also had a significantly lower median neutrophil count (10.1 vs 26.7 x 109/L; p=0.002) and lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (4.6 vs 16.4; p=0.009); categorically none had leukocytes &amp;gt; 20 x 109/L (0 vs 63%; p=0.002). In addition, patients with G-CSF3R had lower median ferritin levels (54 vs 533 ug/L; p=0.001) and significantly fewer presented abnormal LDH levels compared to T618I-positive counterparts (11 vs 63%; p=0.02). Median VAF in the G-CSF3R cohort was strictly 50% (vs 46% in CSF3R-T618I; p=0.03). There were no significant differences in hemoglobin (median 138 vs 120 g/L; p=0.16) or platelet counts (median 304 vs 319 x 109/L; p= 0.7) respectively, between G-CSF3R vs T618I groups. Clinical trajectories and management: G-CSF3R vs CSF3R-T618I Over a median follow-up of 32.2 months (range 12-64), none of the G-CSF3R-mutated cases presented thromboembolic events or progressed to acute leukemia or another hematologic malignancy (vs 1 each in the CSF3R-T618I group; p=0.21). Interestingly, none of the 17 patients had a hemorrhagic event. Regarding management, none of the G-CSF3R-mutated cases required any treatment; all were managed expectantly, vs 67%/56% of CSF3R-T618I cases necessitating 1/2 lines of therapy, respectively (p=0.001). Notably, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis disclosed significantly more favorable overall survival in G-CSF3R vs T618I patients, with median not reached vs 32.2 months, respectively (p=0.04). Conclusion This is one of the largest CSF3R-mutated cohort series worldwide. An unexpectedly high proportion of tested patients resulted CSF3R-positive, contrasting with the rarity of CNL, suggesting not all mutated cases harbor this disease. Previous work has demonstrated aggressive clinical course in CSF3R-T618I patients. Reciprocally, we thoroughly characterized patients with non-T618I CSF3R germline/suspected germline variants, who presented an appreciably more indolent phenotype and favorable outcomes. Clinicians should suspect a germline mutation in appropriate clinical context (family history, absence of splenomegaly/symptoms, lower neutrophil count, normal LDH) and confirm with germline tissue sampling. Although germline CSF3R variants appear to confer a more indolent clinical profile, their long-term impact is undetermined; we therefore recommend long-term monitoring in these patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.186
Threshold uncertainty score0.549

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicEosinophilic Disorders and SyndromesFrench-language works237,207