MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405046626 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-208893

Ibrutinib in Elderly Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Adverse Event Incidence, Management, and Outcome in a Canadian Real-World Setting

2024· article· en· W4405046626 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ibraheem Othman, Seyedeh Zahra Moossavi, Samaneh Bayati, Yoon Hwan Chang, Shubrandu Sanjoy, Karolina Grzyb, Eric Sy, Kayla Cropper, Sandy Kassir, Waleed Sabry

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsSaskatchewan Health AuthoritySaskatchewan HealthSaskatchewan Cancer AgencyUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIbrutinibMedicineInternal medicineDiscontinuationAdverse effectChronic lymphocytic leukemiaNeutropeniaFludarabineRashOncologyLeukemiaChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) ibrutinib was first authorized by Health Canada in 2014 due to transformational efficacy in the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and subsequently in patients with previously untreated CLL. Long-term clinical trial and real-world experiences have informed a comprehensive risk-benefit profile, enabling adverse event (AE) management strategies that optimize patient safety and efficacy outcomes. However, reports of serious AEs and recent head-to-head trials comparing next-generation BTKis to ibrutinib have led to concerns about its toxicity and continued use in clinical practice. To investigate and clarify this further, we assessed the incidence of AEs of special interest, and AE management strategies and their outcomes, in clinical practices that encompass all patients treated with ibrutinib for CLL in Saskatchewan since 2014. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study utilizing medical chart reviewsof patients treated with ibrutinib for CLL in Saskatchewan from 2014-2023 with ≥12 months of follow-up from treatment start. Incidence of AEs of interest (anemia, arthralgia, atrial fibrillation, diarrhea, hypertension, infection, major bleeding, neutropenia, rash, thrombocytopenia) experienced while on active ibrutinib are reported. Management strategies for cases of first-onset AEs (foAEs; defined as initial occurrences of all AE types experienced by a patient) are characterized and include ibrutinib dose management (hold, reduction, discontinuation), symptomatic therapy (concomitant medication), and supportive (IV fluids, blood products) and vigorous supportive (surgery, intubation) interventions. Successful management of foAE is defined as resolution or control allowing continued active ibrutinib treatment. Results: Overall, 187 patients were treated with ibrutinib, with median time from treatment initiation to data cutoff of 3.1 years. Most patients received ibrutinib for relapsed CLL (33.7% 2L; 32.6% 3L+), with 33.7% receiving it 1L. Median [IQR] age was 75.7 [66.7-82.4] years, 63% male, with the highest prevalence of coexisting conditions at ibrutinib initiation being diabetes (15.5%), renal disease (10.2%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (8.6%). All patients initiated ibrutinib as monotherapy at 420 mg. Median [IQR] duration of ibrutinib treatment was 2.9 [0.8-5.6] years. ≥1 AE of interest was observed in 81.3% of patients; 42.8% experienced two or more. AE incidence included infections (42.8%), diarrhea (29.4%), rash (17.6%), neutropenia (12.8%), arthralgia (10.2%), thrombocytopenia (10.2%), anemia (9.6%), atrial fibrillation (8.6%), hypertension (7.0%), and major bleeding (3.7%). No grade 5 AEs were observed. Overall AEs led to ibrutinib hold, dose reduction, and discontinuation in 29.9%, 11.8%, and 16.6% of patients, respectively. Of 284 foAE cases (72.2% gr1/2, 27.8% gr3/4) in 152 patients with ≥1 AE, 90.8% were successfully managed allowing continued active ibrutinib treatment [anemia (100%), rash (97%), arthralgia (94.7%), infection (93.7%), hypertension (92.3%), diarrhea (90.9%), thrombocytopenia (89.5%), neutropenia (87.5%), atrial fibrillation (75%), and major bleeding (42.9%)]. Management strategies included ≤1-month dose hold (12.3% cases) or 1-2 month hold (1.8% cases) followed by ibrutinib reinitiation at same or lower dose; symptomatic therapy (45%); and supportive (17.6%) and/or vigorous supportive (1.7%) interventions. Median time to successful management ranged from 27.0 days [range: 12.5-73.0] for infections to 84.0 days [range: 55.0-141] for hypertension. Overall, in patients with ≥1 AE, 82.2% had all, 7.9% had some, and 7.9% had no foAEs successfully managed (n=3 data missing). Conclusion: Overall AE and discontinuation rates were comparable or favourable to previous reports, with no AE-related deaths observed. Management strategies were effective for the majority of foAEs, enabling continued active ibrutinib treatment for most patients with ≥1 AE. This real-world analysis suggests that ibrutinib may be safely used and managed in a majority of CLL patients encountered in routine practice, including elderly patients. Future analyses should provide additional insight into any impacts of line of therapy, age, and comorbidities on AE incidence, management, and outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.270
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207