Effects of metabolizable energy intake and body weight restriction on layer pullets: 2 - Body composition and onset of lay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the effects of dietary ME and BW restriction on layer pullet sexual maturation, carcass composition and reproductive organs. Two trials were conducted: a precision feeding (PF) (Experiment 1) and a conventional (CON) experiment (Experiment 2). Experiment 1 was a 2 × 4 factorial arrangement with two feed allocation (FA) levels: meal every visit (MEV) or restricted to the lower limit of Lohmann Brown-Lite recommended BW; and three dietary ME levels: Low, Standard (Std), and High (2,600, 2,800, and 3,000 kcal/kg, respectively); the fourth treatment enabled birds to choose from the three diets (Choice). Experiment 2 was a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement with two FA levels: ad libitum or restricted to the lower limit of the strain recommended BW; and three dietary ME levels: Low, Std, and High. In Experiment 1, age at first egg (AFE), BW at first egg (BWFE), and carcass composition estimations were recorded. In Experiment 2, age at 50 % of egg production (A50), BW at 50 % of egg production (BW50), and chemical carcass composition were determined. Weight of reproductive organs were measured only in Experiment 2. Data were submitted to ANOVA on each experiment with the two main effects and age as fixed factors. Differences were reported where P ≤ 0.05. The BWFE and BW50 were greater in the MEV- and ad libitum-fed compared to the feed restricted birds in Experiments 1 and 2, respectively. Carcass lean and fat percentage were greater and lower in the feed restricted compared to the MEV- and ad libitum-fed pullets at 20 and 18 wk of age, respectively. Carcass fat percentage around photostimulation age (18 and 20 wk) was greater in the High ME compared to the Low ME fed pullets. Large yellow follicles (number and weight) and ovary (weight and percentage) were greater in ad libitum-fed compared to feed restricted birds. In conclusion, pullets fed greater dietary ME increased fat deposition and feed restricted birds had delayed sexual maturation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".