Home Is Where the Art Is: The Transformative Roles of Place and Art Making in Personal Mythology (Chez soi là où l’art mène : les rôles transformateurs du lieu et de la création artistique dans la mythologie personnelle)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article explores the transformative roles of place and art making in the development of a personal mythology related to a nature-based, kinship worldview. This exploration is grounded within terrapsychological inquiry, which is a qualitative methodology that seeks a deep understanding of the soulful connection between land/place and people. The specific research method was an autoethnography of the author’s experiences over a four-year period supported by personal journaling and artwork. The autoethnography is written via a series of three macrolevel metaphoric themes, the wording of which reveals changes in personal mythology: (a) from captivity to freedom; (b) from constraint to sovereignty; and (c) from alienation to connection. Within those metaphoric developments, the narrative weaves together insights related to themes such as landline, kithship, enchantment, deep play, animism, and kinship which emerged in the art, experiences, and personal myth development. Those diverse nature- and place-based themes relate to the practice of art therapy rooted in a diversity-honoring, kinship perspective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.048 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".