MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405081721 · doi:10.1002/lpor.202401492

Ultrabroadband Light Coupling for Integrated Photonics via Nonadiabatic Pumping

2024· article· en· W4405081721 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Weiwei Liu, Chijun Li, Bing Wang, Tianyan Chai, Lingzhi Zheng, Zhuoxiong Liu, Xiaohong Li, Cheng Zeng, Jinsong Xia, Peixiang Lu

Bibliographic record

VenueLaser & Photonics Review · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersWuhan Institute of TechnologyWuhan National Laboratory for OptoelectronicsNatural Science Foundation of Hubei ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCollege of Family Physicians of Canada
KeywordsCoupling (piping)PhotonicsPhysicsOptoelectronicsOpticsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Enlarging bandwidth capacity of the integrated photonic systems demands efficient and broadband light coupling among optical elements, which is a vital issue in integrated photonics. Here, an ultrabroadband light coupling strategy based on nonadiabatic pumping is developed, and the designs in thin‐film lithium niobate on insulator platform are experimentally demonstrated. It is found that nonadiabatic transition produces a decreased dispersion of the phases related to eigenstates in the waveguides. As a consequence, high‐efficiency and dispersionless directional transfer are realized between edge states, which leads to an ultrabroadband light coupling covering a 1 dB bandwidth of ≈320 nm in experiment (>400 nm in simulation), with a length (≈50 µm) ≈1/10 of that required in conventional adiabatic transfer approach. Moreover, the coupling strategy exhibits a low insertion loss (<1 dB), a low crosstalk (<−10 dB), and a great robustness against structural deviations (≈100 nm). Furthermore, complex functional devices including beamsplitter and multiple‐level cascaded networks are constructed for broadband light routing and splitting. This work preserves significant advantages simultaneously in extending the operation bandwidth to all of the optical communication bands and minimizing the footprint, which demonstrates great potential for large‐scale photonic integration and high‐speed information processing on chip.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLaser & Photonics ReviewSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207